Blogger Ronni Bennett has put up some must-read posts outlining an initiative designed to have a huge impact on Social Security and Medicare. In fact, the initiators want to dismantle both “entitlement” programs. I don’t know about you, but I don’t have any problem collecting that money. There’s nothing slimy to me about the word entitlement when it comes to Social Security and Medicare. I clearly remember those two itemized deductions printed on my paystubs, every two weeks, over 37 years in the full-time workforce. As far as I’m concerned, I’m getting back MY own money, with interest. They just held it for me to make sure I didn't spend it too early. A wise move... But, I digress. I urge you to read Ronni’s two reports, written with clarity and passion, at. They will make your hair stand on end: http://www.timegoesby.net/weblog/2009/12/the-war-against-social-security-and-medicare.html#comments http://www.timegoesby.net/weblog/2009/11/the-secret-war-on-social-security-and-medicare.html Here’s economist Barbara Kennelly’s take on what’s really worth worrying about (hint—we’re trying to reform it): … a CBO analysis explains that if every entitlement in the federal budget were repealed outright — eliminating Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other critical programs — but nothing were done to slow the growth in health care costs overall, we would still find ourselves spending almost 70 percent of the nation’s wealth on health care by 2082. On the other hand, if the rate of growth in overall health care is restrained so it is no longer growing faster than the rest of the economy, Medicare’s long-range financial deficit could be cut by well over one-half. Contrary to the political crisis rhetoric, the Social Security Trustees report that Social Security will have sufficient funds to pay full benefits through 2041. Even better, the CBO projects that full benefits can be paid through 2049. No other federal program is subject to such strict, long-term spending restrictions and oversight. The Social Security Trustees report every year on the income and outgo of the fund over a 75-year period. Over the next 75 years, Social Security has a funding gap, but that gap is both modest and manageable. Moreover, even if no changes at all were made in Social Security, and no one is recommending that, incoming revenues after 2041 would be sufficient enough to finance 78 percent of benefits. Barbara B. Kennelly published in Roll Call, March 11, 2009 http://www.rollcall.com/news/33061-1.html Read more here: Monique Morrissey, Economic Policy Institute http://www.epi.org/analysis_and_opinion/entry/we_need_health_care_ reform_not_an_entitlements_commission/ The Recession will NOT Bankrupt Social Security http://www.ncpssm.org/news/archive/vp_economic_recession_ss/ CommentsWed, 02 Dec 2009 10:15:51 Thanks for the kind words about my blog. Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:12:13 You have to watch those sneaky b's all the time. Thanks to Ronni and to you for bringing this to the attention of all Seniors. Karen Holmgren Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:00:35 Hi, I sent an email to the PBS Newshour asking them to check this out and give us a report. Linda Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:43:06 Social Security is so complicated that only a few actuarial types really understand it. However, one common misconception that I saw in the e-mail is that Social Security is like a pension system, that is, individuals contribute into their own accounts, which grow and supply their benefits when they apply for them. Leave a Reply | Blogger Profile
reporter, writer, wife, mother, stepmother, grandmother, photographer, singer, knitter, swimmer -- not all at the same time
songbird@birdsonawireblog.com Blog Awards
Honest Scrap Kreative Blogger 
Do you love the song Shine On?
Order Daisy Mayhem’s Big Old Life cd, here: http://www.raniarbo.com/store.html click here for stories about
1960s Sit Ins click here for
|
